Mark

Busch

Mark Busch

Mark Busch's works slice through the glossy veneer of fashion imagery with a draftsman's precision and a keen sense for interference. His interventions, such as paperclips, cutting mats, stencils, and utility tools, are not decorative but diagnostic, revealing the hidden architectures of control behind beauty's facade. These are not nostalgic gestures; they are calculated interruptions that reframe the image as something under surveillance, under revision. Busch does not deconstruct for chaos; he edits for clarity, composing with the chill exactness of someone who knows the system too well to be seduced by it.

In the Words of the Artist

My process of selecting materials is intuitive rather than conceptual. When an image intrigues me, I simply experiment to see if I can make something compelling out of it—sometimes successfully, sometimes not. The materials I gravitate toward most frequently come from fashion and culture magazines, particularly publications like Vogue.

I'm particularly drawn to fashion imagery because high-end fashion magazines usually showcase the most talented photographers and compelling models. These publications offer some of the most beautiful, distinctive images available, and that uniqueness lends itself naturally to my approach to collage.

I define my practice primarily as collage. While I began in graphic design, over time, my practice has evolved, unintentionally shifting toward a more artistic approach grounded in collage. Although I've moved away from purely abstract work, I still incorporate graphic design’s precision. This transition has made it clear to me that I'm not fully in control of my process or its direction. Moving from digital tools to analog methods was gradual but significant, driven by the desire to continually surprise myself with new techniques and materials.

Transitioning from graphic design into collage and abstract work has definitely changed how I think about authorship and control. It’s made clear to me that I’m not entirely in control of my process or its direction. What began as a gradual shift from working digitally to incorporating more analog methods has turned into a pursuit of constant experimentation—I’m always trying to surprise myself with new techniques, materials, and possibilities.

‍

Much of my work emerges from fragments—objects with prior lives, histories, and uses. My approach is to reposition or juxtapose these fragments to present them in a completely new context. That act of transformation—taking something familiar and inserting it into a fresh narrative or environment—is probably my favorite part of the process.

The world I’m most interested in creating through these juxtapositions is primarily aesthetic and emotional, but it should also have a sense of tactility. I love what George Lucas did with Star Wars, especially how the machinery and aircraft in the early films were scratched-up, worn, and visibly used—never pristine or perfect.

Scale and density play into my decision-making through my background in graphic design. In graphic design, it's essential to establish a clear focal point supported by secondary and tertiary elements. These secondary details create depth and reinforce the central focus, making the entire composition stronger. That same principle guides how I approach compact, densely layered works—almost like creating miniature topographies.

I’m not intentionally interrogating the authority of design systems. It’s more about the natural boredom that comes from working repeatedly with the same tools and limited shapes in graphic design. After a while, you crave something new and different. That’s why I push myself to experiment as much as possible—using hole punchers, staplers, found metal objects—to introduce rupture or concealment into those otherwise standardized, repeatable forms.

‍

‍

I don't intentionally set out to create humor or playfulness in my work—I’m always striving for something beautiful, not necessarily comedic—but viewers might interpret it that way. Eyes, for example, naturally draw attention because they're so direct compared to other body parts like arms or legs. Seeing someone’s eyes creates an immediate connection. Conversely, hiding the eyes introduces mystery. I find it fascinating how covering just the eyes can dramatically shift a viewer’s perception and emotional response to an image.

I don’t consciously consider the gaze or how my pieces might look back at the viewer. Instead, my decisions are guided by my own intuitive reactions. It's amazing to me how an image can become completely uninteresting if shifted slightly in one direction yet captivating if moved just a few millimeters the other way. Architect Mies van der Rohe famously said, “God is in the details,” which I think humorously but accurately describes my approach to working with subtle visual adjustments.

I strive for precision by establishing one main idea or focal point. After that, everything else must fall into place to support and strengthen the overall composition. Typically, I begin by selecting an image first, but occasionally, intriguing objects themselves become the starting point. Either way, the process involves careful experimentation, often using simple tools like staplers and hole punchers to maintain a balance between precise planning and spontaneous exploration.

‍

‍

About the Artist

Mark Busch is a Denmark-based designer and artist whose practice is shaped by the principles of Scandinavian design and the clarity of Swiss minimalism, drawing particular inspiration from figures like Josef Müller-Brockmann and the iconic Helvetica aesthetic. His work often integrates a deep appreciation for striking, thought-provoking photography. Busch has created album artwork for both international and Danish musicians, bringing a distinctive visual sensibility to the music world.

Website | Instagram